On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 22:12 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 04/30/2009 08:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > <snip> > .... > </snip> > > On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 20:01 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > > > > You can't move the goalposts about. If the rule is changing things after > > preview is a really significant deal, then there shouldn't be that level > > of changes actually happening. > > > > Hum... > > Afaik I know the final freeze was "Tue 2009-04-14" > > This meeting was held 10 day's later.. > > And as is mentioned in final freeze policy > > " The purpose of the final freeze is to prevent changes while the > release is prepared" > > I would categories this as an significant change. > > "As of the final freeze for a release, no new builds are allowed for > packages already in the Fedora collection > (new packages can still be reviewed, added in CVS and built as potential > updates)" > > And I would think that the other application would have to follow the > above procedure and be built as potential update. > > I must be misunderstanding something which is not the first time nor the > last :( Well, as I said, just look at what actually happens. The policy is clearly not honored. Look back at the rawhide compose reports since 2009-04-14, and see the changes yourself. It's a bit hard to cite this policy as an objection to just *one* change, while hundreds of other fly by unchallenged. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
