On 04/30/2009 08:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: <snip> .... </snip> > On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 20:01 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > You can't move the goalposts about. If the rule is changing things after > preview is a really significant deal, then there shouldn't be that level > of changes actually happening. > Hum... Afaik I know the final freeze was "Tue 2009-04-14" This meeting was held 10 day's later.. And as is mentioned in final freeze policy " The purpose of the final freeze is to prevent changes while the release is prepared" I would categories this as an significant change. "As of the final freeze for a release, no new builds are allowed for packages already in the Fedora collection (new packages can still be reviewed, added in CVS and built as potential updates)" And I would think that the other application would have to follow the above procedure and be built as potential update. I must be misunderstanding something which is not the first time nor the last :( JBG http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-11/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FinalFreezePolicy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
