Re: Fedora 11 nerfed my mixer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 18:37 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sun, 26.04.09 11:34, Callum Lerwick (seg@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 09:34 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > > The proposals I've seen to work around PulseAudio's problems have been
> > > > ridiculous -- running audio over the network using PulseAudio,
> > > > introducing a bunch of latency which wouldn't otherwise be there, was a
> > > > stupid suggestion even if the other box wasn't running Windows.
> > > 
> > > FYI, PulseAudio also runs on Window$.
> > > http://www.cendio.com/pulseaudio/
> > 
> > Does that come with DirectSound drivers so World of Warcraft will feed
> > through it?
> > 
> > ... Though I still don't see why network latency and packet loss are
> > more desirable than a single analog patch cable. Also my IAudio U3
> > doesn't have ethernet, or wireless...
> 
> Not sure what kind of cheap cabling you have. But packet loss on local
> ethernet is near zero.

And wireless?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux