On Fri, 24.04.09 23:48, David Woodhouse (dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > I don't think we're just going to decide that Fedora doesn't care about > these users -- and from what I saw today I don't think it's likely that > the PA folks will decide that they _do_ care. > > So it looks like if we keep PulseAudio as the core around which Fedora > audio support is based, we're _always_ going to need to keep something > extra to fill the functionality gap. Oh great. This sounds like an invitation to stop working on cleaning up the volume control situation entirely. If we never can get rid of the old cruft and need to prominently feature it in all future release then why even try? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
