On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:29:05PM -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > King InuYasha <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> I think this squares with my theory up-thread that it's mostly a network > >>>> issue and not the database per se. It would be interesting to compare > >>>> the ping times the two of you see to bugzilla.redhat.com. > > > >> [ two responses, no data ] > > > > I take it nobody wants to sully their complaining with actual facts > > that might help narrow down the problem. > > > > regards, tom lane > > > >From my desktop: > > $ ping -c 50 -i 5 -q -s 512 bugzilla.redhat.com > PING bugzilla.redhat.com (209.132.176.231) 512(540) bytes of data. > > --- bugzilla.redhat.com ping statistics --- > 50 packets transmitted, 50 received, 0% packet loss, time 245167ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 114.606/118.980/135.277/3.966 ms > You could probably compare how fast the pages render via elinks vs Firefox. Don't know how much of the time is spent doing JavaScript or generating the huge list of components... I bet there's some sort of website profiling plugin for Firefox out there that would help...... Ray -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
