On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > King InuYasha <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> I think this squares with my theory up-thread that it's mostly a network >>>> issue and not the database per se. It would be interesting to compare >>>> the ping times the two of you see to bugzilla.redhat.com. > >> [ two responses, no data ] > > I take it nobody wants to sully their complaining with actual facts > that might help narrow down the problem. > > regards, tom lane >From my desktop: $ ping -c 50 -i 5 -q -s 512 bugzilla.redhat.com PING bugzilla.redhat.com (209.132.176.231) 512(540) bytes of data. --- bugzilla.redhat.com ping statistics --- 50 packets transmitted, 50 received, 0% packet loss, time 245167ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 114.606/118.980/135.277/3.966 ms -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
