On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Basil Mohamed GoharHow slow is it? And how is moving to a new buzilla going to help with
<abu_hurayrah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 3. Red Hat Bugzilla is SLOW. I'm serious. It's that big of an issue
> for me. I hope having our own would make it "go faster".
that? I use it regularly enough, I haven't noticed anything special
about it of late.
How had you not noticed how slow it is? For me, on average it takes approximately 2.5sec to load a page. Red Hat Bugzilla takes approximately 15-20sec to load a page. This gets really bad when you consider the number of pages you go through to get stuff done in the bugzilla. However, I severely doubt Red Hat or the Fedora Project will allow the separation of bug trackers at this time for the simple reason that Fedora bugs are often tied to Red Hat bugs. All Red Hat people would have to do is tag a bug for RHEL in addition to Fedora. This kind of bug tracking simplicity is something I doubt they would be willing to give up.
In any case, it might be a better idea to move off of Bugzilla and to something else. I would like to suggest Mantis Bug Tracker (http://mantisbt.org). It is quite nice in my experience and it even has scripts available to migrate from Bugzilla to MantisBT. In my experience, it is closer to the average page load that I usually get than Bugzilla, taking at most 5sec to load a page with it being less than 3sec most of the time.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
