Re: Independent Fedora bug tracker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2009-04-22, 15:57 GMT, Tom Lane wrote:
> If there are two trackers involved, one or the
> other is going to get looked at less frequently, and given who pays
> me I'm afraid Fedora is going to lose out.

I would add that there are components, which I am going through 
just because it is more convenient to do so, but in case I would 
have to set up new queries just to satisfy somebody's need for 
change, I would just skip them ... seamonkey, epiphany, galeon, 
that's about you, I am talking!

Matej

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux