On 2009-04-22, 16:07 GMT, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote: > Those are some really good points. In the "FOSS needs > a central bugtracker" thread, there's an idea of issue trackers > communicating with each other. Theoretically, this would > alleviate some, if not all, of the work load of someone having > to check two issue trackers, because if one can be consider > upstream to the other, then the data can flow with the work > only needing to be done in one place. <rant> OK, either you are trolling or you are serious and you have some brainpower to stand behind your words. If the former, then read http://slashdot.org/features/98/10/13/1423253.shtml very carefully and then go and do something useful. If the latter, then I have a couple of bugs for you to solve: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452962 -- that should be easy, just make periodic XML-RPC requests and store it in the database. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189813 -- OK, this is biggie, and you will need to work closely with people around http://www.bugzilla.org . On the other hand, I heard they work on this, so any real help you can provide to them would be very welcome. And fixing either of these would actually help somebody (me included; yes, I would love to click on the button "Move upstream" in RH Bugzilla) to fix bugs better. Your suggestion (aside from making a lot of work for somebody else, not talking about huge costs in hardware and bandwidth -- and yes, they are huge, just believe me) doesn't seem to help to anybody. </rant> Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
