On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Right, it absolutely would require you to setarch before launching a > build for the 32-bit arch. The question is why that's so unworkable. > Especially when the present alternative just plain doesn't work. > > I note that it's already expected by a lot of spec files (or at least > by several of mine) that `uname -i` correctly reports the target arch. I honestly don't know. I don't see much wrong with it. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
