Callum Lerwick <seg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 13:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> That doesn't solve the problem. The part of the problem that's actually >> not solved today is the /usr/bin/foo-config problem. Without a fix for >> that, making it a bit easier to deal with include-file diffs isn't >> worth anything. > The same way cross compilation identifies gcc and strip and whatnot. > Prefix it with the architecture. Which immediately breaks all the upstream configure scripts that are trying to use the config program in the first place. You can get away with renaming the compiler because there's twenty years of precedent for not hard-coding the value of $(CC), and workable infrastructure for build processes to avoid assuming anything about it. There is no precedent or infrastructure for dependent packages to find mysql-config under any name but that one. The approach that I thought about when I first ran into this problem was to have the config script examine the value of `uname -i` to decide which output to produce. I remember being told that that wasn't acceptable, but I do not recall exactly why not. regards, tom lane -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
