Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Actually the only reason that mysql-config is a binary and not a script >> is that there doesn't seem to be any other good way for it to know which >> word-width it's supposed to return results for. This is one of the main >> problems with trying to do software builds in a multilib environment. > What is wrong with renaming the xxxxx-config binary to > xxxxx-config.%{arch} (or moving it to %{_libdir}) and writing a > platform independent shell script xxxxx-config that will call the > correct xxxxx-config.%{arch} file? How is the platform independent shell script to know which arch-specific file to call? (This is an actual question, not a rhetorical one.) AFAIK there is nothing it can look at that isn't likely to do the Wrong Thing from the perspective of someone trying to build software. regards, tom lane -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list