On 04/23/2009 12:26 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
Actually, I think the Fedora Infrastructure team, from what I've witnessed, is
more the capable of doing this. Unless I'm totally clueless (which I may be),
if Fedora Infrastructure undertook running an issue tracking system
themselves, I do not think it would be the most complex system in the whole
project. I think they handle far more challenging tasks on a day-to-day
basis.
Nothing personal but you're not in a position to make this judgement.
We've not even setup a test version populated with data about the size
that would be required for Fedora so no analysis of what we could or could
not do has been done.
-Mike
I know that. I'm just a Fedora user. This thread is exploratory, and
I'm trying to get this kind of information out there. I didn't mean to
speak for the team at all, I just wanted to say I think greater problems
have been tackled.
Is Bugzilla so hard to manage, though? Is the data really that enormous?
Another example that comes to mind, though definitely not
apples-to-apples, was the migration from MoinMoin to MediaWiki. Yes, I
realize Bugzilla does much more than a wiki does, but I witnessed a lot
of the process of that migration, and yes, it's still ongoing, and there
was stumbling along the way. But the community really came together on
that and helped-out. I also realize that currently, Bugzilla is much
more of a core app to both Fedora & Red Hat than the Wiki is or likely
ever will be. But the concept of migrating a system is not new to
Fedora. The key is how can we leverage the community to help with it.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
