On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote: > On 04/23/2009 12:14 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > Biggest Con is that infrastructure which already has limited resources would > > need to run it. AFAIK we have no one with experience that could setup and > > run > > a bugzilla/ other bug tracking system. this is largely the reason why we > > have > > not done it. > > > > The other reason its not been done is that we need a way to move bugs to Red > > Hat's bugzilla and move from Red Hat's bugzilla to whatever we run. people > > misfile bugs. they effect fedora and rhel and need cloning. there is alot > > of > > extra bits needed that you seem to not have considered. > > > > Step 1 find people to do the work, > > Step 2 do an analysis of the needed workflows. > > Step 3 find hardware, bandwidth and all needed resources > > Step 4 setup system, and migration plans > > > > Just trying to point out its not as simple as you seem to think. > > > > Dennis > Actually, I think the Fedora Infrastructure team, from what I've witnessed, is > more the capable of doing this. Unless I'm totally clueless (which I may be), > if Fedora Infrastructure undertook running an issue tracking system > themselves, I do not think it would be the most complex system in the whole > project. I think they handle far more challenging tasks on a day-to-day > basis. > Nothing personal but you're not in a position to make this judgement. We've not even setup a test version populated with data about the size that would be required for Fedora so no analysis of what we could or could not do has been done. -Mike > I think the misfiling of bugs would be far *less* if we had separate issue > trackers. What are the odds a Fedora user is going to file something on Red > Hat's Bugzilla, if they've never heard of it before (I can understand, during > the transition, a lot of this happening). Likewise, who would file a bug for > RHEL in Fedora's issue tracker, if they're completely separate websites? > Maybe I just didn't understand what you meant here. > > I definitely didn't think it was simple. Rather, I feel it is important and > we should make a goal to achieve. > > And everyone keeps talking about bandwidth for Bugzilla. Am I missing > something? Are there huge binary files being transferred that I'm missing? > How many GB/day are we talking? > > I believe allowing Fedora Infrastructure to run their own issue tracker will > result in a leaner & meaning instance that will likely run better than Red > Hat's, if only because it'll be fresher, but also because they'll have greater > control to suit the community's needs. > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
