Re: Independent Fedora bug tracker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/23/2009 12:14 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Biggest Con is that infrastructure which already has limited resources would
need to run it. AFAIK  we have no one with experience that could setup and run
a bugzilla/ other bug tracking system.  this is largely the reason why we have
not done it.

The other reason its not been done is that we need a way to move bugs to Red
Hat's bugzilla and move from Red Hat's bugzilla to whatever we run.  people
misfile bugs.  they effect fedora and rhel and need cloning.  there is alot of
extra bits needed that you seem to not have considered.

Step 1 find people to do the work,
Step 2 do an analysis of the needed workflows.
Step 3 find hardware, bandwidth and all needed resources
Step 4 setup system, and migration plans

Just trying to point out its not as simple as you seem to think.

Dennis
Actually, I think the Fedora Infrastructure team, from what I've witnessed, is more the capable of doing this. Unless I'm totally clueless (which I may be), if Fedora Infrastructure undertook running an issue tracking system themselves, I do not think it would be the most complex system in the whole project. I think they handle far more challenging tasks on a day-to-day basis.

I think the misfiling of bugs would be far *less* if we had separate issue trackers. What are the odds a Fedora user is going to file something on Red Hat's Bugzilla, if they've never heard of it before (I can understand, during the transition, a lot of this happening). Likewise, who would file a bug for RHEL in Fedora's issue tracker, if they're completely separate websites? Maybe I just didn't understand what you meant here.

I definitely didn't think it was simple. Rather, I feel it is important and we should make a goal to achieve.

And everyone keeps talking about bandwidth for Bugzilla. Am I missing something? Are there huge binary files being transferred that I'm missing? How many GB/day are we talking?

I believe allowing Fedora Infrastructure to run their own issue tracker will result in a leaner & meaning instance that will likely run better than Red Hat's, if only because it'll be fresher, but also because they'll have greater control to suit the community's needs.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux