Re: packages that have not yet rebuilt in dist-f11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 15:29 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> 
> My intention, when I asked for cvs, was to have the package submitted
> to F-11-updates, not to F-11 itself. The package got approved on the
> 17th. Should I have waited until F-11 is released to ask for cvs? I
> want to learn this to do things the "proper" way next time.

You did it the proper way.  The maintainers whom haven't rebuilt their
packages yet and force the fact that we continue to have to monitor
which ones haven't been built, and catch packages like yours by accident
is who haven't done it the proper way.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux