On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 15:11 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: >> > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 14:19 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> >> >> >> I don't understand. >> >> >> >> oget (1): >> >> zynjacku >> >> >> >> This new package was built 1 day before your email. Do I need to apply >> >> for a final freeze break? I don't care if the package goes directly to >> >> F-11 or to the updates. >> > >> > It should go somewhere, I suppose I'll have to try and modify the script >> > to look at pending updates, but those aren't guaranteed to go out, so >> > you could also just mentally filter it. >> > >> > This is the problem with taking so long to do your builds, the >> > constraints of the testing start to break down. >> > >> >> Phew... I built the package 4 hours after cvs was done. Is that considered slow? >> >> Orcan >> >> ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 > > I didn't mean you in particular, I meant that we're months from the > effort start and still having to track down undone builds. This is > starting to conflict with folks like you bringing new packages in during > a freeze period. > > -- > Jesse Keating My intention, when I asked for cvs, was to have the package submitted to F-11-updates, not to F-11 itself. The package got approved on the 17th. Should I have waited until F-11 is released to ask for cvs? I want to learn this to do things the "proper" way next time. Orcan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
