On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 15:11 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 14:19 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > >> > >> I don't understand. > >> > >> oget (1): > >> zynjacku > >> > >> This new package was built 1 day before your email. Do I need to apply > >> for a final freeze break? I don't care if the package goes directly to > >> F-11 or to the updates. > > > > It should go somewhere, I suppose I'll have to try and modify the script > > to look at pending updates, but those aren't guaranteed to go out, so > > you could also just mentally filter it. > > > > This is the problem with taking so long to do your builds, the > > constraints of the testing start to break down. > > > > Phew... I built the package 4 hours after cvs was done. Is that considered slow? > > Orcan > > ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 I didn't mean you in particular, I meant that we're months from the effort start and still having to track down undone builds. This is starting to conflict with folks like you bringing new packages in during a freeze period. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
