-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Panu Matilainen wrote: > In this case the breakage was bad enough I seriously doubt anybody has > managed to build anything with rpm using the broken glibc.i586 versions. > Rpm fails to even read its configuration in that case, never mind > actually building something. If you want to complain then to the idiots who made the decision to go with .i586 instead of .i686 for x86 binaries. This is exactly the kind of problem I've been warning about all along. Using the i586 target stresses code paths (in this case in gcc) which are hardly ever used since nobody cares for this target in general. - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkneR6sACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHS+ZgCferaXxBdD2WcPP3BBogs1NO3J h3oAn31J+J3VDDe6mAZw1N0gsv5+Yxst =f+60 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
