Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > All glibc.i586 after beta is broken right now, and due to some other > bugs in play, glibc.i586 was being chosen more often for our build > chroots than glibc.i686 in glibc builds greater than -12. We untagged > -14 before it could be pushed into rawhide so that our buildroots will > keep working while the glibc folks get a working glibc.i586 package out. > This should all be fixed up today. Would you consider reverting glibc to something older than -12? Frankly, I don't trust anything that's been built since that went into the buildroots, and the longer it's live the more likely we are to regret it. regards, tom lane -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
