On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:44:45 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Would you consider reverting glibc to something older than -12? > Frankly, I don't trust anything that's been built since that went > into the buildroots, and the longer it's live the more likely we > are to regret it. I am not sure that the drama is so epic. Here's my main laptop on which I'm typing this: [zaitcev@niphredil ~]$ rpm -q glibc glibc-2.9.90-12.x86_64 glibc-2.9.90-12.i686 [zaitcev@niphredil ~]$ I did not know that glibc was "broken" until you mentioned it. Everything works just fine... except Emacs apparently. To be sure, it's an important application for some users, but I would not say that "anything that's built" is untrustworthy. My code has good "make distcheck" and it passes. I think you might be taking it too far. -- Pete -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
