Re: review request for libpst

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Carl Byington <carl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Thanks to everyone for their comments. Thinking about this dependency
> from the main libpst package to the -libs subpackage, it seems that we
> should have

> Requires: %{name}-libs >= %{version}-%{release}

> in the main package.

I think the standard recommendation is to use a requires like this with
"=", not ">=", to bind together different subpackages.  It's almost
never a good idea to let non-matching subpackages be installed together
... unless you would like to take on the burden of testing all such
combinations to see if they work.

There is a packaging guideline about this IIRC.  Have you read
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines

			regards, tom lane

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux