Re: My first DontZap use case while testing F11 beta

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: My first DontZap use case while testing F11 beta
From: Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 04/08/2009 10:02 AM


I was talking this over with Kristian actually.  Since we allocate the
front buffer dynamically for KMS, we could probably let the maximum
virtual size be 4k or so (which I think really is the 2d limit).  In
principle, well-behaved GL apps are supposed to check the
GL_MAX_VIEWPORT_DIMS limit, since that's the maximum window size that's
expected to work.  So if compiz were well-behaved, it would refuse to
run if the root window were larger than that.

Whether compiz actually _does_ that is another question, of course.  But
I think changing the max virtual to 4k for intel 915 and 945 might be a
less bad set of tradeoffs.

I remember when I used an ATI card (and binary fglrx driver) that had a 2kx2k OpenGL limit, compiz only drew a 2048 wide composited window on my 2560x1024 dual-monitor system. This was back in the X.org 7.0/7.1 days. I had a nice white gap on half of the right monitor where it didn't draw.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux