Re: My first DontZap use case while testing F11 beta

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Casey Dahlin wrote:
psmith wrote:
the vote was taken in secret by the xorg folks a while ago, real
community spirit in action!

phil


So we can either write a new graphics server or let them get away with it. Would /you/ like to write a knew graphics server?

The term is meritocracy, not democracy. Someone's mistakes are going to show up in the product no matter what. It tends to work out for the best if its the mistakes of people who usually know what they're doing.

--CJD

but why the need for a *secret *vote? why not do it in the open so all of the x users can go look at the logs and at least see their reasoning behind this change that effects every x user? better still the fedora 'community' can revert the upstream change, it has been done plenty of times before and i don't see why this should be different?

as for writing a new gfx server, well no but i will compile x with the standard behaviour set regardless

phil

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux