Re: libsyncml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 17:33 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2009-03-25, 12:00 GMT, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I think there was also a historic problem in that when 0.22 was 
> > still current, there was no really good interface for it (you 
> > only had msynctool the console client, or multisync-gui, which 
> > isn't very good). The KitchenSync from KDE 3 is actually an 
> > awesome GUI for opensync 0.22 which makes it really easy to set 
> > things up
> 
> Not disputing, just to note that Conduit is pretty cool (and 
> pretty buggy so far, I am afraid).

Yeah, I actually know the Conduit developer and have chatted with him
pretty often regarding the opensync integration :). That's the same case
as KitchenSync - it's a more recent development (it wasn't available at
all while 0.22 was actually the 'current' release).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux