Re: libsyncml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sa März 21 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rawhide Report wrote:
> > libopensync-plugin-syncml-0.35-4.fc10.i386 requires libsyncml.so.0
>
> To elaborate on this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479954#c7
>
> The thing is, nothing builds against libsyncml 0.5.0. osmo has syncml
> support disabled and libopensync-plugin-syncml has broken dependencies. So
> the 0.5.0 build is completely useless, the only way out I see is to revert
> it with an Epoch bump.

The up to date upstream release of libopensync-plugin-syncml requires 
libsyncml 0.5.0, so probably libopensync-* can be bumped to 0.38 do get it 
working. I have successfully built libopensync, the file and the syncml plugin 
and the msynctool locally[0] with some adjustments to the spec files. But it 
may also be better to go back to the 0.2X branch of libopensync, because it is 
documented and there are a lot of people who have successfully used it. The 
0.3X packages do not sync syncml with the file plugin here, but I also did not 
test 0.2X.

Regards,
Till

[0] http://till.fedorapeople.org/repo/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux