On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:03 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote: > >>>>> "AW" == Adam Williamson writes: > > AW> On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:27 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > >> Adam Williamson wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 14:15 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote: > >> > >> > of course, if Andreas is only going to indisposed for a few days, we > >> > could just wait for him. Jesse tells me he can still just push a build > >> > as normal and it'll get into Rawhide for F11 as soon as the beta's done. > >> > >> So should someone file a bug? It seems we are all in agreement on what > >> should happen, I'm just not sure who is going to do any of it. ;) > > AW> Well I have to run off and sell my laptop to a guy, and I'll be back in > AW> a couple of hours. If no-one else has filed a bug by then I'll do it > AW> before the Canucks game comes on. =) > > Yes, one of you, please file a bug. To make it easier for > provenpackagers to do the rebuilds it would be best to extract the > spec files from the SRPMs that Andreas has provided, diff them agains > the current devel/ branches in Fedora CVS and post the patches, rather > than just post the links to the SRPMs which makes provenpackagers have > to do all the legwork... ;) OK, I've now filed a bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492013 it doesn't include spec diffs yet (I'm sitting in Starbucks typing this on my very-tiny laptop, it's not set up for CVS). I'll check with Andreas whether he expects to be back in time to do this himself, and if not, I'll post spec diffs to the bug later. Apologies for the weird sig, I don't have my normal one set up on the laptop. -- Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
