On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 14:15 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote: > AW> So Andreas is happy for this to be proposed to get into F11 at this > AW> point. Echoing Nathan's question - where does this get taken next? > > I suggest opening up bug on libopensync, add the patches against the > current spec file(s) that fix the API, bump Epoch tag and do any the > required Obsoletes/Provides. Has Andreas already provided the > necessary modifications to the spec files that would do all this? Yes, as I said, the packages in that testing location I linked to earlier in the thread already do the obsoleting correctly, I've tested this. SRPMs are in there, it's not just binary packages. > Then post the link to the bug here and request people in the > provenpackager group to apply the patches, do the rebuilds and request > rel-eng tagging (assuming they get done in time for the f11-beta). > Since Andreas has already given the node for rebuilds to be done in > his absence, this should be OK. Here's the link again: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/opensync-synce/SRPMS/ of course, if Andreas is only going to indisposed for a few days, we could just wait for him. Jesse tells me he can still just push a build as normal and it'll get into Rawhide for F11 as soon as the beta's done. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
