On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:58 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 20:39 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > >> Actually F10 is shipping a KDE 4 port of libopensync-plugin-kdepim from a > >> work branch (which may or may not work, I built it and all I know is that > >> it builds) and since 4.2 there's now an Akonadi syncing plugin (which > >> requires 0.38 as KitchenSync does and which is also disabled as "not ready" > >> just like KitchenSync). > >> > >> Speaking of this, this is one drawback reverting: we won't be able to build > >> that KDE 4 libopensync-plugin-kdepim anymore. :-( That said, as I wrote > >> above, I have no idea if it's even working at all right now. > > > > Thanks for the update there - I didn't know work had actually begun on a > > plugin. > > > > On 0.38 vs. 0.36 - yeah, it really doesn't make much of a difference. > > Neither is at a point where you could reasonably use it on production > > data on *any* device or app. > > So what needs to happen to revert? Is it possible? I'm a lurker here, > but wouldn't mind increasing my participation if it would help. The packages I linked to earlier already do it, actually. It mostly just involves using some Epochs and being careful with the obsoletes. I already had to do this for Mandriva a few months back. I tested, and the packages Andreas built work fine - if you install all rawhide opensync packages then enable his test packages as a repository (the directory's set up as a yum repo), then do 'yum update', it all works as it should do. I think Andreas was just waiting on my testing and possibly a few tweaks before pushing it, but I wouldn't want to speak too far on his behalf. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
