Re: libsyncml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 20:39 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> Actually F10 is shipping a KDE 4 port of libopensync-plugin-kdepim from a
> work branch (which may or may not work, I built it and all I know is that
> it builds) and since 4.2 there's now an Akonadi syncing plugin (which
> requires 0.38 as KitchenSync does and which is also disabled as "not ready"
> just like KitchenSync).
> 
> Speaking of this, this is one drawback reverting: we won't be able to build
> that KDE 4 libopensync-plugin-kdepim anymore. :-( That said, as I wrote
> above, I have no idea if it's even working at all right now.

Thanks for the update there - I didn't know work had actually begun on a
plugin.

On 0.38 vs. 0.36 - yeah, it really doesn't make much of a difference.
Neither is at a point where you could reasonably use it on production
data on *any* device or app.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux