Re: Should bluez be in base, or split deps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:49 PM, psmith <johnsmithdoe14@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx) said:
Orion Poplawski wrote:

Funny that kdebluetooth wins over bluez-gnome. �I thought shortest wins,
or is this an epoch thing?

AFAIK, bluez-gnome is obsoleted by gnome-bluetooth, which has a longer
name
than kdebluetooth.

are you saying that packages that provide the same functionality are chosen
to install by which has the shorter name?

yes that's how it work.

wow, that just seems so archaic!

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux