Re: Should bluez be in base, or split deps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:49 PM, psmith <johnsmithdoe14@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>
>> Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx) said:
>>>
>>> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Funny that kdebluetooth wins over bluez-gnome.  I thought shortest wins,
>>>> or is this an epoch thing?
>>>>
>>>
>>> AFAIK, bluez-gnome is obsoleted by gnome-bluetooth, which has a longer
>>> name
>>> than kdebluetooth.
>>>
>
> are you saying that packages that provide the same functionality are chosen
> to install by which has the shorter name?

yes that's how it work.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux