Re: Should bluez be in base, or split deps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Funny that kdebluetooth wins over bluez-gnome.  I thought shortest wins,
> > or is this an epoch thing?
> 
> AFAIK, bluez-gnome is obsoleted by gnome-bluetooth, which has a longer name
> than kdebluetooth.

Then bluez-gnome either needs to be blocked, or not built (if it's a
subpackage.)

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux