Re: F10 Fresh Vanilla Install with Updates Has Broken NetworkManager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



nodata wrote:
Am Montag, den 16.03.2009, 00:34 +0100 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Tom Lane wrote:
So the real question is: why in heck did yum install an update of NM
that it knew it didn't have the dependencies for?  I surmise that the
install process is using --nodeps, and that seems just plain stupid.
The install process ignores dependencies it cannot satisfy because otherwise
you couldn't do an upgrade without added repositories.

        Kevin Kofler


So for the case of no added repositories, will repoclosure not catch
this? Is there a test for this?

The process of building the install images for the DVDs pulls in all dependencies itself so it's not an issue for a fresh install from media; in the case of the problem in this thread, there *was* an added repo (updates).

Paul.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux