On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:29:54 +0100 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > Here's the problem as I see it. libudev0 is in the release > > repository, but it did not get placed on the dvd image as the > > NetworkManager that came with the dvd did not depend on it. A later > > NetworkManager update does depend on it. I'm not sure why your > > scenario isn't picking up libudev0 and installing it. I'll have to > > do more local testing to try to confirm this behavior. I've never > > run into it myself, but my update habits may have prevented me from > > noticing this previously. > > You added only updates and not Everything, so there's nowhere it > could pick it up from as it never got updated. > > Of course, if you do add Everything, that may end up used instead of > the packages on the DVD. I would hope that the installer assigned a lower "cost" in yum to the DVD than any network repo, which would avoid this issue. Paul. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
