On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 10:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > The use cases I care about are exactly as I wrote: I need to be able to > look at a bug report and see what releases it expects. We need to be > able to set the status of the bug independently for each release it > affects - it could be WONTFIX for F-9, ASSIGNED for F-10 and FIXED for > Rawhide. We need to be able to associate it with reports in other bug > tracking systems, as LP does, and see the status of these other reports > directly from the Fedora report. And this needs to be searchable (I need > to be able to search for bugs which are NEW in F-10, and get the right > results). Just noticed another nice LP feature in the ext4 bug report someone just linked to: "I'm going to mark this bug as "affecting" ecryptfs-utils, but mark it "invalid", such that search results for users with the same problem might find themselves here." Can't do THAT in BZ, either. https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317781 , comment from Dustin Kirkland on 2009-03-07 (on the negative side of the ledger, LP comments don't appear to be numbered :>). Permalink is https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317781/comments/57 (so there's the hidden comment number...) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
