On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Possibly the clearest thing to do would just be to use the same flow > RHEL uses, even if the names would be a bit odd for Fedora (since we > don't really have 'Errata' for Fedora releases). Otherwise, the Fedora > flow should at least be clearly defined somewhere, and explained on that > page in Bugzilla. Or fedora migrates to a different bug tracking system dedicated to Fedora workflow without any of the rhel memes hanging around. -jef"Hopes his wife doesn't concluded that he got sick and lost his voice as an excuse to not talk to the in-laws at all this week while they are visiting"spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
