On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There are still two components that are going to remain proprietary as part > of Canonical "secret sauce" business model but maybe can just replace that > for our needs and of course Launchpad will probably be stuck with bzr while > we need to support other SCM's as well. I think Canonical hasn't been as forthcoming as they could about how important the not to be released CodeHosting is to actually making any implementation of launchpad work on a daily basis. Take that as speculation on my part of course, since what is publicly avaliable concerning the role of the CodeHosting component is quite sparse. But I wouldn't hold my breath for the Malone component being opened in such a way that it was easily turned into a stand alone bug tracking service. And I don't think we'll see the point in investing the manpower to reverse engineer CodeHosting just to get an alternative bug tracker working. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
