On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:37:29AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > There was a meeting at one point (I think FESCo but I could be wrong) > where the cvsadmin groups was given responsibility for putting new > members in cvsadmin. I believe that this technically covers all the > groups except secondary arches -- who have the same powers but different > groups and different responsibilities. > > Just pointing out the history; not necessarily what should be. It is somehow odd to have a complex trust system with many levels of control (roughly packager -> provenpackager -> sponsor) for contributors that have less power, while there is no apparent control/procedure for the cvsadmin group. At least people having cvsadmin powers granted should be provenpackagers, and maybe cvsadmin members could be identified and something about them could be added in the policies pages, be it only a mention to an informal process to become cvsadmin. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
