Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:47:08AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Oliver Falk (oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >>> Well. Here's my mail. As secondary arch maintainer (alpha), I'd like to >>> be added to the provenpackager group - of course... >> Assuming the alpha team has a full normal secondary arch group (and you're >> in it), you shouldn't need provenpackager access. > > Wouldn't it be better if secondary arch group member gained their rights > through the provenpackager process, instead of through another process? > > And same for releng, security, and QA members? > There was a meeting at one point (I think FESCo but I could be wrong) where the cvsadmin groups was given responsibility for putting new members in cvsadmin. I believe that this technically covers all the groups except secondary arches -- who have the same powers but different groups and different responsibilities. Just pointing out the history; not necessarily what should be. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
