Re: PLEASE READ: provenpackager reseed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:47:08AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Oliver Falk (oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > Well. Here's my mail. As secondary arch maintainer (alpha), I'd like to  
> > be added to the provenpackager group - of course...
> 
> Assuming the alpha team has a full normal secondary arch group (and you're
> in it), you shouldn't need provenpackager access.

Wouldn't it be better if secondary arch group member gained their rights
through the provenpackager process, instead of through another process?

And same for releng, security, and QA members?

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux