On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:22:53PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: >On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:47:08AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Oliver Falk (oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >> > Well. Here's my mail. As secondary arch maintainer (alpha), I'd like to >> > be added to the provenpackager group - of course... >> >> Assuming the alpha team has a full normal secondary arch group (and you're >> in it), you shouldn't need provenpackager access. > >Wouldn't it be better if secondary arch group member gained their rights >through the provenpackager process, instead of through another process? > >And same for releng, security, and QA members? No, because provenpackager is not at the same permission level as those. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
