On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:46:04PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: >On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:34:53AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > >> >Wouldn't it be better if secondary arch group member gained their rights >> >through the provenpackager process, instead of through another process? >> > >> >And same for releng, security, and QA members? >> >> No, because provenpackager is not at the same permission level as those. > >Do you mean that they can also change packages with ACL on? Or are you >referring to something else? None of those groups are CVS ACL groups from what I remember. The members of some of those groups have cvsadmin, which is higher than provenpackager. Being a part of those groups does not immediately grant you cvsadmin priviledges though. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
