Tom Lane (tgl@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > RPM already tracks architecture for detected library dependencies. This > > really only comes into play for BuildRequires that could reasonably be > > multilib and any hardcoded library requires. So, not 75% of packages. > > More like 2%. > > That doesn't make me feel better unless there's some pretty clear rule > for figuring out which packages are the 2%. Right at the moment it > seems to me that *any* BuildRequires is vulnerable, because a SRPM by > definition has no library dependencies. Please explain why it's not. If foo-devel requires foo, due to libfoo.so being a symlink to libfoo.so.3, the architecture is already tracked. If foo-devel reqires bar-devel, it is not. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
