"Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 03/06/2009 12:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> If true, this is completely horrid --- this means every single package I >> own is broken, and probably 75% of everything else is too. Can't we get >> this fixed in RPM, rather than having to kluge it in the specfiles? > RPM already tracks architecture for detected library dependencies. This > really only comes into play for BuildRequires that could reasonably be > multilib and any hardcoded library requires. So, not 75% of packages. > More like 2%. That doesn't make me feel better unless there's some pretty clear rule for figuring out which packages are the 2%. Right at the moment it seems to me that *any* BuildRequires is vulnerable, because a SRPM by definition has no library dependencies. Please explain why it's not. regards, tom lane -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
