Denis Leroy píše v St 04. 03. 2009 v 12:15 +0100:
> Alex Lancaster wrote:
> >>>>>> "OP" == Orion Poplawski writes:
> >
> > OP> buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>> gdal has broken dependencies in the development tree:
> >>> On ppc:
> >>> gdal-1.6.0-4.fc11.ppc64 requires libhdf5.so.5()(64bit)
> >>> gdal-1.6.0-4.fc11.ppc64 requires libodbcinst.so.1()(64bit)
> >>> gdal-1.6.0-4.fc11.ppc64 requires libodbc.so.1()(64bit)
> >
> > OP> I'm happy to do the bootstrap rebuild to fix this, but ACLs are closed.
> >
> > I've repeatedly requested the maintainer open up the ACLs on these
> > packages, but never received a response to my e-mails on this subject.
> > It's very frustrating.
> >
> > What is the procedure in these cases to get a maintainer to justify
> > keeping ACLs closed? Escalate to FESCo?
>
> It's also using a non-verifiable source tarball:
>
> Source0: %{name}-%{version}-fedora.tar.gz
>
> when the upstream source is easily downloadable at
>
> http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal-1.6.0.tar.gz
>
>
> That's unacceptable.
modified source archive usually means that some non-free part were
stripped
Dan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
