>>>>> "OP" == Orion Poplawski writes: OP> buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> gdal has broken dependencies in the development tree: >> On ppc: >> gdal-1.6.0-4.fc11.ppc64 requires libhdf5.so.5()(64bit) >> gdal-1.6.0-4.fc11.ppc64 requires libodbcinst.so.1()(64bit) >> gdal-1.6.0-4.fc11.ppc64 requires libodbc.so.1()(64bit) OP> I'm happy to do the bootstrap rebuild to fix this, but ACLs are closed. I've repeatedly requested the maintainer open up the ACLs on these packages, but never received a response to my e-mails on this subject. It's very frustrating. What is the procedure in these cases to get a maintainer to justify keeping ACLs closed? Escalate to FESCo? Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
