On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 03:51:39AM -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote: >>>>>> "OP" == Orion Poplawski writes: > >OP> buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> gdal has broken dependencies in the development tree: >>> On ppc: >>> gdal-1.6.0-4.fc11.ppc64 requires libhdf5.so.5()(64bit) >>> gdal-1.6.0-4.fc11.ppc64 requires libodbcinst.so.1()(64bit) >>> gdal-1.6.0-4.fc11.ppc64 requires libodbc.so.1()(64bit) > >OP> I'm happy to do the bootstrap rebuild to fix this, but ACLs are closed. > >I've repeatedly requested the maintainer open up the ACLs on these >packages, but never received a response to my e-mails on this subject. >It's very frustrating. > >What is the procedure in these cases to get a maintainer to justify >keeping ACLs closed? Escalate to FESCo? Does the maintainer still fix bugs and otherwise work on the package? If not, start the AWOL maintainer process. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
