Alex Lancaster wrote:
"OP" == Orion Poplawski writes:
OP> buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
gdal has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
gdal-1.6.0-4.fc11.ppc64 requires libhdf5.so.5()(64bit)
gdal-1.6.0-4.fc11.ppc64 requires libodbcinst.so.1()(64bit)
gdal-1.6.0-4.fc11.ppc64 requires libodbc.so.1()(64bit)
OP> I'm happy to do the bootstrap rebuild to fix this, but ACLs are closed.
I've repeatedly requested the maintainer open up the ACLs on these
packages, but never received a response to my e-mails on this subject.
It's very frustrating.
What is the procedure in these cases to get a maintainer to justify
keeping ACLs closed? Escalate to FESCo?
It's also using a non-verifiable source tarball:
Source0: %{name}-%{version}-fedora.tar.gz
when the upstream source is easily downloadable at
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal-1.6.0.tar.gz
That's unacceptable.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
