Re: %config files and upgrade to F11 - consider noreplace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:51 +0000, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > You told me on IRC that this wasn't realistic because rpm would have to
> > open the file twice.  Care to elaborate so everyone can understand?
> RPM API users set up a callback that is, among other things, used to
> provide the downloaded package file to RPM.  Calling this callback where
> it wasn't called before is an API change, possibly breaking the RPM
> front-ends.

How about computing _both_ an md5 and sha256 hash at the same time when
the rpmdb still has an md5 hash for that file ? 

David


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux